The Quest For PageRank - How PR Works

Google Google PageRank - it’s what all web designers, web masters, and bloggers covet. Despite this desire for a higher number, an aura of mystery surrounds both Google and it’s PageRank - and for good reason. Google’s inner-workings is a closely guarded secret. However, back when Google first started they published the equation that calculates PageRank. They most likely use a variation of that equation, but the original will be good enough for our exploration purposes.

The Formula:
PR(A) = (1-d) + d(PR(t1)/C(t1) + … + PR(tn)/C(tn))*
where t1 and tn is the pages linking to Page A, C is the number of outbound links on Page A, and d is the ‘damping factor’ - which is normally 0.85.

If you’re mathematically challenged (like me) - here’s a simpler way of looking at it:
Page A’s PageRank = 0.15 + 0.85 x (a share of the PageRank of every page that links to it)

Basically, get links - get PageRank.

But there’s more to it than just links - so let’s dive into that.

When Page B links to Page A, Page B is ‘voting’ for Page A. Page A’s new PR is Page B’s PR x 0.85 + 0.15.
If Page B and Page C links to Page A, then Page A’s new PR is Page B’s x Page C’s x 0.85 + 0.15.

Simple, right?
Well, it seems so - but there is more to consider.
To keep this post manageable, I’ll speed through them.

If you look closely at the equation, you’ll notice that the worth of the link is divided by the quantity of links on that page. Thus, the more links on one page, the less they’re worth.

Google’s PR system isn’t the smartest. For example, http://plainbeta.com, http://www.plainbeta.com, and http://plainbeta.com/index.html are different pages to a crawler.
(So standardize your pages!)

The maximum PR increases as the number of pages on the site increases. So the more pages you have, the greater your PR can be. This is why you should submit your sitemap to Google through Google’s Webmaster Tools. If you’re a blogger using Wordpress, use the Google Sitemap Generator to index your site and submit it to the Google God.

Paid links are another thing to consider. In fact, there has been quite a hype in the past with bloggers losing their PR because of paid links and then getting it back by removing them.
So, don’t put paid links on your site if you’re concerned about PR - if you do, you’ll be penalized.
Update: However, if those links have “nofollow” (What’s NoFollow?) enabled, then it’s alright to have them. However, Google can be finiky, so things could get a little hairy - but you should be alright. (thanks to David Airey for the reminder)

And link farms… Some people believe they’re great - others don’t. If you get a link on a link-farm - it won’t be worth much. Remember what we learned earlier, the more links on a page - the less they’re worth. And often, Google will ignore link-farms in their calculations. Furthermore, if you link to a link-farm, you could be penalized.

And finally, Cookie-cutter pages (multiple pages that are exactly or nearly alike) can penalize your site. If you were to buy half a dozen domains, and put the exact same thing up with links to your web site(s), that would be a cookie-cutter site. That could spell trouble.

Want to get some tips on how to increase your page rank?
Check out the next post in The Quest for PageRank series: How to Increase PageRank.


Don’t know your site’s PageRank? Find you’re site’s page rank.

 

13 Responses to “The Quest For PageRank - How PR Works”

  • Nice review, Brian.

    I’m not sure that adding paid links will get you a penality, providing you add ‘nofollow’ to their code. That should be okay, but I’m miles away from being an authority.

    Hope the weekend was a good one.

     
  • That is very true - I forgot to mention that.
    I’ll add that in there - thanks!

     
  • [...] As we learned before, getting links is the only way to increase your Google PageRank. So the question that would follow is, how do you get links? But there’s a little more to it than just getting links. Some links have more influence than others… the better the content the greater chance of links… so there’s more to it. Now, I know this horse has been beaten to dead, so I won’t make this complicated. Without further ado, let’s dive into increasing PageRank. [...]

     
  • [...] one to two sentence descriptions, the form of approval, and the site’s Google PageRank (What is Google PageRank?). The second part is 14 specialty showcases. I included the same info with the second set as the [...]

     
  • [...] The Quest for PageRank - How it Works This is the first post in a two-post mini-series on Google’s famous PageRank. The first post in the series explores PageRank itself and how it works. (The second post explores how to increase PageRank) [...]

     
  • wow that was nice formula. Thanks for the information.

     
  • I’m curious, do you have a source for the equation? Did it come from a book or is it in some archived google blog? I’d love to read more about it.

     
  • Yes I do Scott.
    Web Workshop’s article on PR.

    It is actually linked to in my article, but it’s just a little star (*) after the equation.
    :-)

     
  • Story added…

    Your story was featured in wscoop! Post: http://www.wscoop.com/Evaluate/The-Quest-For-PageRank-How-PR-Works...

     
  • Actually, the source of that equation is Brin and Page’s original “google” paper:

    The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine

    that you can download here:

    http://infolab.stanford.edu/pub/papers/google.pdf

    and has probably long since been replaced by something much more complex.
    Also, there’s at least two things that are wrong (or at least not clear) about this blog post.

    1.) They specifically mention in the paper that the 1-norm of the PR eigenvector is normalized to 1, and that the 1-norm is always preserved. This basically means that if you sum all the PR of all the pages in the world, it adds up to one.

    2.) You also have to be careful about dangling links, as these would “drain” PR out of the system and ruin the normalization condition.

    Hope this helps!

     
  • Thank you very much Bruno for the info!

    Yes, I am aware that the equation is probably very different, but the same principals are probably virtually the same. Google’s too secretive to understand it perfectly, but we can make some decent guesses.

     
  • You say: “So standardize your pages!” But how to do this?

     
  • By standardizing your pages, I simply mean “keep your links consistent.”

    If you’re linking to your home page, keep the links identical - don’t have yoursite.com and yoursite.com/index.html.
    Having the differing links will hurt your PageRank.

     
  • Leave a Reply